case law citation us - An Overview
case law citation us - An Overview
Blog Article
Google Scholar – an unlimited database of state and federal case legislation, which is searchable by keyword, phrase, or citations. Google Scholar also allows searchers to specify which level of court cases to search, from federal, to specific states.
Article 199 with the Constitution allows High Court intervention only when "no other enough remedy is provided by law." It's well-settled that an aggrieved person must exhaust readily available remedies before invoking High Court jurisdiction, regardless of whether Individuals remedies suit them. The doctrine of exhaustion of remedies prevents unnecessary High Court litigation. Read more
As the Supreme Court is definitely the final arbitrator of all cases where the decision has become reached, therefore the decision with the Supreme Court needs to become taken care of as directed in terms of Article 187(two) with the Constitution. ten. We must dismiss these petitions because the Supreme Court has already ruled on this. Read more
This ruling has conditions, and Because the petitioners failed a qualifying Examination, they cannot claim equity or this Court's jurisdiction based within the Niazi case analogy. nine. In view of the above facts and circumstances in the case, petitioners have not demonstrated a case for this court's intervention under Article 199 from the Constitution. Read more
Therefore, the petition and any related applications are dismissed. The Petitioner should go after his remedy through an appeal before the competent authority. If these types of an appeal has not nonetheless been decided, it should be addressed. Following that decision, the Petitioner may possibly then look for further recourse before the Service Tribunal. Read more
Since the Supreme Court is definitely the final arbitrator of all cases where the decision continues to be achieved, therefore the decision on the Supreme Court needs to be taken care of as directed in terms of Article 187(2) on the Constitution. ten. We must dismiss these petitions because the Supreme Court has already ruled on this. Read more
PLR is a revolutionizing platform democratizing and making legal research easy and accessible in Pakistan :
Quite a few judgments have affirmed that the mere registration of a crime does not constitute a "public interest" justification for restricting a person's liberty. Therefore, the Respondent's actions in inserting the Petitioner's name over the ECL based to the criminal case common law cases are inconsistent with proven legal principles. As a result, this petition must be allowed Read more
The justices must be balanced between the political parties, these types of that neither party has an advantage of more than just one seat. To qualify to provide about the Supreme Court, a candidate must have been admitted to practice legislation in New Jersey for at least 10 years. This may be the same necessity as for Superior Court judges.
The law of necessity recognized and upheld by Pakistan's highest judicial body has proved an honorable protection for military adventure in civil government.it absolutely was the illegal action called legislation of necessity..
Matter:-DIRECTION Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Creator) Const. P. 255/2025 (S.B.) Zubaida W/O Muhammad Irfan V/S Inspector General of Police (IGP) Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi SHC Citation: SHC-252210 Tag:The regulation enjoins the police for being scrupulously fair to the offender plus the Magistracy is to be certain a fair investigation and fair trial for an offender. Unfortunately, these objectives have remained unfulfilled. Aberrations of police officers and police excesses in dealing with the regulation and order situation have been the topic of adverse comments from this Court and from other courts Nonetheless they have did not have any corrective effect on it. The police has the power to arrest a person even without obtaining a warrant of arrest from a court. The a lot of this power casts an obligation on the police and it must bear in mind, as held by this Court that if a person is arrested for your crime, his constitutional and fundamental rights must not be violated.
The reason for this difference is that these civil legislation jurisdictions adhere to the tradition that the reader should be capable to deduce the logic from the decision and the statutes.[4]
Since the Supreme Court is the final arbitrator of all cases where the decision is arrived at, therefore the decision with the Supreme Court needs to generally be taken care of as directed in terms of Article 187(2) of your Constitution. 10. We must dismiss these petitions because the Supreme Court has already ruled on this. Read more
Free database for searching federal court dockets and documents pulled from PACER. Coverage is not really detailed, but this is a wonderful starting point. See Background section at bottom of RECAP website for more information.